VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
David HasselhoffCrystal AllenRyan McCluskeyPatrick Regis
DIRECTOR
Don E. FauntLeRoy
SYNOPSICS
Anaconda: Offspring (2008) is a English movie. Don E. FauntLeRoy has directed this movie. David Hasselhoff,Crystal Allen,Ryan McCluskey,Patrick Regis are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2008. Anaconda: Offspring (2008) is considered one of the best Action,Adventure,Horror,Sci-Fi,Thriller movie in India and around the world.
More
Anaconda: Offspring (2008) Trailers
Same Actors
Same Director
Anaconda: Offspring (2008) Reviews
Possibly the worst movie sequel I have ever seen...
Although I have never been a "fan" of the Anaconda series of movies, when I heard this would air on Sci-Fi Channel I decided to watch it since I've seen the previous two installments. Big mistake... This movie comes fully equipped with bad acting from all the supporting cast (except for Mr. Davies and the Austrailian guy), horrible snake and gore effects, gaping plot holes, absolutely retarded story (Giant snakes are the key to immortality?!), and half-@ssed directing. *SPOILER ALERT* Also, the sudden change of Hasselhoff's character at the end of the movie from good guy to bad guy was unnecessary in the highest degree. It's almost as if the writers of this abomination decided to add a *startling plot twist* after the completion of the movie and revised the script, as his turn makes no sense at all. *END SPOILERS* I seriously advise against renting or buying this movie, but if you have a totally overwhelming urge to watch this, don't say I didn't warn you...
Hoff fine, movie is stunningly bad...........................
Hasselhoff fans please don't be angry because my comments here are in no way aimed a The Hoff or his talents. I tuned in to "Anaconda 3" because I am a fan of Sci-Fi Channel and a fan of Hasselhoff (who is a competent actor) but was stunned by how bad this movie is. Despite The Hoff's charisma and the fact that he can and does manage to do a good acting job playing villain roles, this movie is just lousy. Very fake snake, cheap CGI, no character development. But the main sin of the movie maker here is that "Anaconda 3" is just not entertaining. It drags in places and often is just not scary. Yes its a "B" movie and in a TV "B" movie I can live with only a smidgen of character development, but here we actually have none. Not any. Zero. Huge snake climbs around roofs but doesn't even knock off a shingle. In contrast, the sci-fi movie "D-War" (2007) has a similar monster but when it crawls on a roof, the building cracks and debris falls off. In "Anaconda III" the animal weighing thousands of pounds rushes around the forest at lightning fast speed but doesn't even snap a twig or stir up any dust (reference "D-War" again), although it leaves a trail in the grass that men can walk through. I know snakes are supposed to be sneaky, but... this giant is not believable enough, even by Sci-Fi Channel standards, and I enjoy most of their product. The extremely fake visuals overwhelm the very capable performances by the cast, and unfortunately cancel out The Hoff's charisma and ability.
Anaconda Offspring: This is where the franchise nose dived I suppose
The first Anaconda was passable, the second was pretty poor but nothing could have prepared me for this! Though the ultra low IMDB rating should have really come to mention it. I guess was doomed from the start, it has a tiny budget by comparison, it's the third film in an already cheesy scyfy level franchise and the biggest star they could get to carry the movie was the "Hoff". So yeah, it all looks so very terrible. I could do better sfx than this (And have), the snakes look pitiful and the cast look positively bored throughout. Though Hasselhoff is better than usual he still can't carry a film and the incredible John Rhys-Davies has a heartbreakingly small role here. To make matters even worse the plot is generic, the pace is snooze worthy and the whole thing is just seven shades of embarassing. One more movie to go at time of writing, it can't get worse than this........right? The Good: The "Hoff" is better than usual John Rhys-Davies The Bad: Poor cgi Actually manages to be incredibly boring The advertised "Stars" are barely in the film Things I Learnt From This Movie: Always know the animal before the hunt Cool girls don't look at explosions either
Sci- Fi does it again
Seriously, anyone that thinks this hunk of garbage is even a decent movie has the lowest standards on the planet! The first Anaconda was the only good one. It had everything, decent cast, great acting(Mostly Jon Voight, perfect setting, awesome animatronics, and the snake actually looked like a real Green Anaconda! Plus it has suspense which The Hunt For Blood Orchid and this butt leakage sorely lacks. If you're going to call a movie "Anaconda" and it's supposed to be about a giant ANACONDA eating people, doesn't it make sense to have the snake look like an ANACONDA?! Even with CGI, they still can't make a decent snake! The ones in the second film looked almost like really big elapids(cobras, mambas, etc), and the ones in this movie look like damn vipers! I swear I saw one scene in which the snake actually had fangs! And not only that, but this film is a rip-off of the Python movies, which are rip-offs of the first Anaconda! The snake is genetically modified instead of being a natural animal, the snake is oddly intelligent, it stares down its prey like it recognizes them, and it impales people with its tail more often than it constricts them. ALL of these are staples of the Python movies. The only decent actor in this entire film was Hasselhoff, and that statement itself should tell you how bad it is. Characters suck, effects suck, CGI sucks, snakes suck, weapons suck, cast sucks, acting sucks, and the plot sucks. Add all this up and you get another Sci-fi channel original suckfest that's not original at all. Really, how sad is it when a movie has to rip-off movies that are already rip-offs? Well, it gets a lot sadder when the rip-off of the rip-offs is the next installment of the series that started the whole damn thing! Anaconda III: more proof that Sci-Fi channel makes the worst horror flicks.
Absolutely dreadful
This gets my vote as the worst of the Anaconda movies. As a sequel and on its own terms, Anaconda III is wretched. The scenery/sets are quite nice and Crystal Allen is decent, but that's it. The photography is flat and rushed and the film looks as though it has been edited on a bacon slicer. The continuity is inconsistent as well complete with poor gore effects, the writing is vacuous and eye-rollingly cheesy in alternative to funny and the story is hopelessly predictable. The direction is sloppy, the music is generic and forgettable, the film is unevenly paced and unsatisfyingly resolved and the characters I didn't feel anything for. The acting is just dire, David Hasselhoff and Crystal Allen are the only ones who try and while the enthusiasm is admirable Hasselhoff is embarrassing in his acting and delivery, Allen however is far more believable and manages to be the film's sole redeeming quality. The other actors look bored and uninterested, and any scenes that tries to be suspenseful, atmospheric or frightening fails, instead it is laughable. Overall, dreadful sequel and film. 1/10 Bethany Cox