VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
Ben Loyd-HolmesAtlanta JohnsonGregory CoxMolly Ruskin
DIRECTOR
Simon Wells
SYNOPSICS
Carnivore: Werewolf of London (2017) is a English movie. Simon Wells has directed this movie. Ben Loyd-Holmes,Atlanta Johnson,Gregory Cox,Molly Ruskin are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2017. Carnivore: Werewolf of London (2017) is considered one of the best Horror,Thriller movie in India and around the world.
More
Carnivore: Werewolf of London (2017) Reviews
What was that!!!
In the name of Gandhi's flip flops, where do I start with this skid-mark in Horror's knickers. On the plus side it's pretty well produced, camera and sound are very polished, it looks like a real film, the downside however is everything else. I really hope it was meant to be this bad, the acting is awful, but to be fair on the cast the lines they have to spew out seem to have been written by a horse. And wait til you see the werewolf, it couldn't have been worse if it had been wearing trainers and a watch, leaning against a tree having a smoke, but, and here's why I gave it 3 stars, I watched the whole thing, mainly to see the stupid couple get slaughtered but I still stayed to the end. This film isn't scary, or funny, or so bad it's good, I don't really know what it is. One scene sums it up perfectly, the "ferocious beast" gets in the house eventually, having previously been completely stumped by locked doors and closed windows!!, so what does the hero do?,, he hides behind a curtain, and the effing werewolf doesn't find him!. Sweet Baby Moses.
Carnivore Werewolf of London: Really poor werewolf flick
Why is it that most werewolf movies are terrible? The concept is solid so why can so few creators actually make something even remotely original or entertaining? Carnivore: Werewolf of London tells the story of a couple who rent a cottage in the middle of nowhere and come under attack from a werewolf. That's basically it. I don't know why they called this Werewolf of London, I can only assume it was some desperate attempt at cashing in on the name of the somewhat more famous film of a similiar name. With sound editing that left me scratching my head, a plot so generic a 10yr old could have written it and very little actual content this is truly a mess. Oh did I mention how bad the werewolf looks? Now I prefer practical sfx and am glad it wasn't some poor cgi embarassment but if you're going to stick a guy in a suit then at least make it look decent. This werewolf looks like a guy in a gorrilla costume but with a supermarket wolf mask on instead. Bad bad stuff. The Good: Erm, setting wasn't bad I suppose The Bad: Some of the worst sound editing I've ever heard Werewolf looks terrible No originality at all Things I Learnt From This Movie: Jumping into a bathtub provides you protection from werewolves Rolling pins are effective weapons agaibst lycans
Absolutely terrible
A sex hungry couple leave London for a break in the country, renting out a cottage in the middle of nowhere. Problem is, in addition to the unfriendly owner, there is a guy lurking outside wearing a laughable hairy costume. Well, it's meant to be a werewolf but looks more like something off an amateur pantomime set. The DVD cover is incredibly misleading. For a start the vast majority of the film takes place in the countryside, not London. Secondly it says "very similar to Dog Soldiers". I think not. It's completely the other end of the spectrum. " Brutal gore shots ". More like very cheap looking effects, blink and you'll miss them. The script is terrible. As is the acting. Why do British film makers think it necessary to have American characters? Sadly the actress who plays Abi couldn't do a convincing American accent if her life depended on it. Partly why I scored this so low, it really irritates me. I picked this up cheap from the supermarket and didn't expect much from it. But my advice is save your time and money, this rubbish is possibly the worst werewolf movie that I have seen.
One star for the costume
Yes it's a horror. A real bottom of the barrel horror movie. Or, maybe it's a parody and in that case it's the worst parody I've seen. The storyline is okay (a couple in a flaky relationship encounters a monster during their weekend rendezvous). I won't say much more because I don't want to ruin it for anyone that wants to be surprised (although I doubt anyone would be surprised by anything that takes place - I sure wasn't). Even though the basic story concept is fine, the script is hideous and it has a high school film project quality to it. Everything else is really terrible. The acting is flat, there is no chemistry at all between to two leads. Neither character gives seems clear as to what their relationship is really all about (lousy script and directing?). Obligatory sex scenes are awkward and seem to be introduced at inappropriate moments in the flow of story. Too bad the actors didn't have better material to work with as this made them all look bad. Camera work is cheesy, music added nothing and pacing just doesn't cut it. There is one thing I found enjoyable - the monster (a wolf kind of thing). Probably the worst costume I've seen since I was a kid and watched Robot Monster (1953) - that was a man with a divers helmet and a gorilla suit. This wolf thing is pretty much on a par with that. This is what made me think that this might be a parody. Yeah, it's that bad. Classic cliché ending but you're so glad it's finally over that you don't mind it at all.
Bad, bad, bad... and funny
A bizarre horror movie. is a mix between a soft porn movie and a child theatre play ... the beast 's costume... OMG